Comments Requested

Before deciding this is too long or boring to read, I encourage you to go to the bottom to look at the PDF’s of scientific research. See if any of the Abstracts resonate with the future you hold for yourself, your children, your grandchildren, and your great-grandchildren. If you find anything of interest, you can come back to the top, start reading, and perhaps send comments to HHS and FCC.

The rapid global rollout of 5G technology which began in 2019 is driven by faster data transmission.  Other countries have adopted exposure limits far below those in the United States and Canada.  The Environmental Health Trust (EHT) has long highlighted peer-reviewed evidence that wireless radiation can harm children, adults, plants, and animals.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent agency of the U.S. government responsible for regulating communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable

In a historic filing last week, the FCC essentially makes clear that it only began responding to the D.C. Circuit Court’s 2021 remand in Environmental Health Trust v. FCC because it was forced to do so.  EHT maintains that the FCC’s unreasonable delays prolong preventable harm, and that stronger oversight would encourage industry to compete on safety, advancing research, and innovation.  EHT has already provided the FCC with thousands of pages of research. The court sided with the EHT in 2021, and even more evidence has emerged in the last five years. (the court decided in our favor in 2021)

The FCC’s outmoded 1996 radiofrequency wireless radiation exposure limits remain in force. EHT’s mandamus petition before the court has not yet been granted or denied.

If you have thoughts on this issue, the HHS request for comment has a space to compose comments directly on the website. You will be able to copy the comment you write to the FCC and paste it directly into the HHS form to share with both agencies. Comments on this notice opened September 21, 2026 and must be received no later than October 21, 2026.

If you are unfamiliar with but interested in learning more about the specific issues identified in the remand order: non-cancer health effects, effects on children, long-term exposure, testing procedures for portable devices, and environmental effects, here are several PDFs of scientific research related to the health impacts of RF (radiofrequency) radiation: 

European Parliament: Health impact of 5G – Current state of knowledge of 5G-related carcinogenic and reproductive/developmental hazards as they emerge from epidemiological studies and in vivo experimental studies

A review of potential health risks of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure from mobile phones and base stations in children and pregnant women

Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation

Effects of 5G frequencies on sperm parameters, mating success, and offspring outcomes in rats

Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective

Hypothesis: ultrasonography can document dynamic in vivo rouleaux formation due to mobile phone exposure

Health impact of 5G: Current state of knowledge of 5G related carcinogenic and reproductive/developmental hazards as they emerge from epidemiological studies and in vivo experimental studies

Cellular and molecular effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields

Chronic paternal Wi-Fi RF-EMR exposure impairs placental efficiency and fetal growth: Association with sex-dependent histone modification patterns in mice

Impact of ELF EMF exposure on sleep quality and mental health in a Tunisian power plant: a cross-sectional study

Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G

Wireless technology is an environmental stressor requiring new understanding and approaches in health care

Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices

Health effects of electromagnetic fields on children

 Immune Responses to Multi-Frequencies of 1.5 GHz and 4.3 GHz Microwave Exposure in Rats: Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analysis

An Exploration of the Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation Emitted by Mobile Phones and Extremely Low Frequency Radiation on Thyroid Hormones and Thyroid Gland Histopathology

Exposure of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Biochemical and Pathological Alterations

Genetic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields

Effect of RFEMR on NSE and MDA levels in Sprague Dawley rats

Amelioration of Cell Phone and Wi Fi induced Pancreatic Damage and Hyperglycemia (Diabetes Mellitus) with Pomegranate and Vit E in Rats

Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans

Monitoring of BALB/C strain mice health, investigation of behavior, hematological parameters under the effect of an electromagnetic field

Long-term exposure to 835 MHz RF-EMF induces hyperactivity, autophagy and demyelination in the cortical neurons of mice

Impairment of Oogenesis and Folliculogenesis in Neonatal Rats after Maternal Exposure to Mobile Phones

Effect of mobile phone usage duration during pregnancy on the general motor movements of infants

Health and safety practices and policies concerning human exposure to RF/microwave radiation

Development of health-based exposure limits for radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices using a benchmark dose approach

Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 1: Rising ambient EMF levels in the environment

Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 2: Impacts—How species interact with natural and man-made EMF

Environmental Health Trust (EHT)

Happy New Year! This very day your CSA Farmers are working on “seed counts” to make sure we are prepared for the upcoming planting season. Robert and I trust the approaching growing season will be as bountiful as the last! We are currently accepting new CSA Members for our 2024 Harvest Season.

January is one of those months when I have time to delve into and share various topics. Here is an opportunity to consider one such issue. If you are so inclined, please share this with others and consider communicating with your state and federal lawmakers to raise their awareness on the subject which follows below.

In a landmark winning case that EHT and others brought against the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, a federal court (the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia) ruled in favor of the EHT and plaintiffs finding that the FCC and the U.S. government had “completely ignored” the issue of environmental effects. 

The court ordered the agency to respond, yet the FCC has remained silent on the issue. The Environmental Health Trust is taking a variety of actions to hold the FCC accountable. A new website is one part of EHT’s comprehensive wildlife program to support meaningful policy changes to protect wildlife.  The proliferation of cell towers and 5G networks cannot be considered “safe” for wildlife as they create impacts to orientation, reproduction, mating, nesting, DNA, and survivorship.

The majority of studies (not sponsored by the telecom industry) found harmful effects and warned that insects were uniquely vulnerable to 5G frequencies.  Protecting the wildlife will protect your food supply since the majority of the vegetables we grow depend upon pollination from insects.

Wildlife and Wireless showcases scientific studies regarding the impact to birds, bees, and trees providing references to direct concerned citizens to the published studies on the environmental impacts of cell towers and other wireless proliferation. It is important to note that safety guidelines for cellular phones and cellular tower radiation have not been updated since 1996.